<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playing to Your Strengths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corporateidealist.com/2009/10/playing-to-your-strengths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corporateidealist.com/2009/10/playing-to-your-strengths/</link>
	<description>Hope for Hardworking Heroes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:17:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: kidd redd</title>
		<link>http://www.corporateidealist.com/2009/10/playing-to-your-strengths/comment-page-1/#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>kidd redd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporateidealist.com/?p=876#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>A consultant once told me, &quot;Find out what you do well and do it; and find out what you don&#039;t do well and don&#039;t do it.&quot; This why I have always believed the &quot;performance review&quot; as executed by most companies/organizations is poppycock. Certainly, folks need to know how they&#039;re doing. But invariably, PR&#039;s get boiled down to &quot;scores&quot; on some sort of &quot;competencies&quot; list, instead of meaningful conversations about what folks are doing well, what&#039;s fulfilling, and so on. A natural reaction to a low &quot;score&quot; is to want to improve it. It rarely occurs to proponents of these types of reviews that the low scores themselves may be meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A consultant once told me, &#8220;Find out what you do well and do it; and find out what you don&#8217;t do well and don&#8217;t do it.&#8221; This why I have always believed the &#8220;performance review&#8221; as executed by most companies/organizations is poppycock. Certainly, folks need to know how they&#8217;re doing. But invariably, PR&#8217;s get boiled down to &#8220;scores&#8221; on some sort of &#8220;competencies&#8221; list, instead of meaningful conversations about what folks are doing well, what&#8217;s fulfilling, and so on. A natural reaction to a low &#8220;score&#8221; is to want to improve it. It rarely occurs to proponents of these types of reviews that the low scores themselves may be meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
