<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s fair in compensation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corporateidealist.com/2009/06/whats-fair-in-compensation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corporateidealist.com/2009/06/whats-fair-in-compensation/</link>
	<description>Hope for Hardworking Heroes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:17:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Damewood Gaucher</title>
		<link>http://www.corporateidealist.com/2009/06/whats-fair-in-compensation/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Damewood Gaucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporateidealist.com/?p=487#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Wow! It&#039;s hard to imagine how different the work world would be if all employers took this approach.  I see definite healthy benefits.  Transparency is a good thing.  I wonder too if it might hurt employers&#039; flexibility in employee retention due to disagreements about the policy and how it is applied.  Would there be disputes that might drag on the organization?  Then again, if so, it might be best for the company if those employees went elsewhere.  Kudos to Fog Creek for stepping out.  I&#039;ll be interested to follow the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! It&#8217;s hard to imagine how different the work world would be if all employers took this approach.  I see definite healthy benefits.  Transparency is a good thing.  I wonder too if it might hurt employers&#8217; flexibility in employee retention due to disagreements about the policy and how it is applied.  Would there be disputes that might drag on the organization?  Then again, if so, it might be best for the company if those employees went elsewhere.  Kudos to Fog Creek for stepping out.  I&#8217;ll be interested to follow the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
