<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The A to Z of Customer Input</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corporateidealist.com/2009/04/the-a-to-z-of-customer-input/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corporateidealist.com/2009/04/the-a-to-z-of-customer-input/</link>
	<description>Hope for Hardworking Heroes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:17:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.corporateidealist.com/2009/04/the-a-to-z-of-customer-input/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporateidealist.com/?p=149#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback, Jim. I agree that getting a pro is the best way. Not only will a pro keep the participant more reassured, but will be able to pull the subtle patterns out of the feedback. I&#039;m a big fan of usability professionals. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback, Jim. I agree that getting a pro is the best way. Not only will a pro keep the participant more reassured, but will be able to pull the subtle patterns out of the feedback. I&#8217;m a big fan of usability professionals. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim voorhies</title>
		<link>http://www.corporateidealist.com/2009/04/the-a-to-z-of-customer-input/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>jim voorhies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporateidealist.com/?p=149#comment-21</guid>
		<description>The best way to do a usability study is to get someone (like me) who does usability for a living - they know how to reassure the customer that it&#039;s not a test of the person, but the site. But they also know how to pull valuable information from the testers and encourage them to think out loud. Testing provides feedback that is astonishing and clarifying and strange, wll at once. People will completely get lost over something you don&#039;t even see some times and not get flustered over what you thought would be a stumbling block.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way to do a usability study is to get someone (like me) who does usability for a living &#8211; they know how to reassure the customer that it&#8217;s not a test of the person, but the site. But they also know how to pull valuable information from the testers and encourage them to think out loud. Testing provides feedback that is astonishing and clarifying and strange, wll at once. People will completely get lost over something you don&#8217;t even see some times and not get flustered over what you thought would be a stumbling block.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
